Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that the assessee and his son ...


No Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) as Assessee Not Proven Owner of Undisclosed Income for Land Purchases.

June 14, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that the assessee and his son have declared the undisclosed income in their individual return of income and have paid taxes but capital expenditure and payment towards purchase of land cannot be held as undisclosed income in the hands of the assessee - no penalty under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) unless assessee is owner of the undisclosed income

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  2. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  4. The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

  5. The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

  8. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - on account of survey, if the assessee has offered additional income, it cannot be a ground to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) unless...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  11. Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

  12. Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

  13. The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accrual of income for assessee society - In assessee`s appeal assessing officer treated contribution towards welfare Fund and Hospital Fund as...

  15. The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates