Section under which assessment order was passed - the assessment ...

Correction of Assessment Order Error: Section 144 Mistakenly Referenced as Section 143(3); Corrigendum is Legal and Valid.

July 6, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Section under which assessment order was passed - the assessment for the year under consideration were u/s 144 and mentioning of Section 143(3) in the preamble of the assessment order is an error which is apparent on the face of the order and requires to be rectified. Therefore, the corrigendum is legal and valid.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Section under which assessment order was passed - the assessment ...

Correction of Assessment Order Error: Section 144 Mistakenly Referenced as Section 143(3); Corrigendum is Legal and Valid.

July 6, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The amendment introduces a temporal limitation on filing correction statements under section 200(3) of the Income-tax Act. Effective April 1, 2025, taxpayers must submit...

Validity of the assessment order framed u/s 153A read with section 143(3) -Assessment has been framed by the AO u/s 143(3), without obtaining the valid approval from the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a corrigendum correcting the total income in the original assessment order. The AO has the power to withdraw, modify or substitute an...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Power of CBIC to issue circular and delegate the functions of 'Proper officer' to issue Audit Report - The High Court held that the impugned circulars are intra vires...

Prevention Detention Order - Smuggling of gold - the order of detention passed for more than two grounds and if one of the grounds is not applicable or vague or...

Levy of penalty - when the petitioner is not entitled to claim concessional rate of tax under section 3% of the TNGST Act, they are liable to pay penalty under section...

Valuation of imported goods - related party transaction - the relationship did not influence the price - Rule 3(3)(a) & 3(3)(b) provide different means of establishing...

10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dealt with a case involving cartelization and bid-rigging in tenders for soil sample testing by the Department of...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Assessment proceedings against one of the legal heirs - deceased/assessee had admittedly more than one legal representatives - Despite the legal heir's explicit...

Bid-rigging cartel involving Toyfort, Austere Systems, and Fimo Info Solutions in soil testing tenders floated by Uttar Pradesh Agriculture Department contravened...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

Seeking cancellation of Name of another Company on the ground that it resembles the name of its company and its business - The Respondent no.3 is willing to cancel and...

Quick Updates: