Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by ...

Taxpayer Wins Appeal: Assessment Invalid as Notice u/s 143(2) Issued by Non-Jurisdictional Officer Without Transfer Order.

August 1, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO, Ward-3(1), lacking jurisdiction as per Notification vesting jurisdiction with ITO, Ward-1(1). ITO, Ward-3(1)'s notice u/s 143(2) non-est in law. No transfer order u/s 127 from ITO, Ward-3(1) to ITO, Ward-1(1). ITO, Ward-1(1) passed assessment order without valid notice u/s 143(2). Assessment framed without valid notice from jurisdictional AO. Assessee's appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by ...

Taxpayer Wins Appeal: Assessment Invalid as Notice u/s 143(2) Issued by Non-Jurisdictional Officer Without Transfer Order.

August 1, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-issue of a notice u/s 143(2) - The Circular reinforces the position that it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to assume...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - Jurisdiction of AO - invalid notice u/s 143(2) - The issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is governed by statutorily prescribed procedures. On a...

Validity of re-assessment proceedings - jurisdiction to issue notice - Validity of notice u/s 143(2) as issued by the ITO, Ward 33(2)(3) who was not empowered - ITO who...

If the Assessing Officer has time in his hands to issue notice u/s 143(2), why is he issuing notice u/s 148, we do not understand, specifically in the background of the...

Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

Validity of reopening of assessment - time limit for issue of notice u/s. 143(2) has not expired and regular assessment could have been made - the assessing officer...

The HC quashed the notice issued u/s 143(2) by the JAO for AY 2023-24, holding that the JAO lacked jurisdiction. As per section 144B(1)(iii), for scrutiny assessment...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Quick Updates: