Admissibility of petition - claim submitted beyond 90 days after ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 24, 2019

Admissibility of petition - claim submitted beyond 90 days after the CIRP begins - RP has not committed any error or illegality in rejecting the claim applying Regulation 12(2) of the Regulations of 2016 - Adjudicating Authority has no power to reopen the resolution process which has already been closed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Admissibility of petition - claim submitted beyond 90 days after ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 24, 2019

You may also like:

Revocation of CBL License - 90 days from the date of issuance of SCN is when the noticee submits reply within 30 days and in a case like this, when the noticee has not...

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of conclusions of its hearing - Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day...

Extension of CIRP period for a further period of 90 day - the intention of the Committee of Creditors to invite fresh Expression of Interest to enable more bonafide...

Transfer Pricing Adjustment - credit period beyond 90 days - the transactions with the non-AE constitute valid Internal CUP inputs and ALP adjustment on account of...

Wages/salaries of the workmen/employees during the CIRP period - There are disputed questions, whether in fact the IRP/RP managed the operations of the corporate debtor...

conversion of CIRP u/ss 7 or 9 or 10 to Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ u/s 55 of the I&B Code after 270 days - Adjudicating Authority exceeded its...

Appeal against order filed by Resolution Professional (RP) was disposed of. Resolution Plan submitted by Appellant was approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) on...

Pronouncement of orders within 90 days after the conclusion of hearing - Covid-19 epidemic - Worldwide lockdown - We are of the considered view that rather than taking a...

TP Adjustment - ALP of interest on receivables - no credit period was agreed between the parties - TPO should not calculate the collection period selectively which are...

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the...

Violation of principles of natural justice, wherein the appellant was not provided an opportunity for a hearing before terminating the insolvency resolution process of...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the clause, which came into effect on the same date. The respondent Directorate had 90 days from 19.04.2018 to file...

Withdrawal of CIRP - The NCLAT emphasized that withdrawal of CIRP necessitates an application by the applicant and approval by 90% of the Committee of Creditors (CoC),...

Delay in implementation of approved Resolution Plan - In the present case, the Approved Resolution Plan has been alleged to be contravened by the Successful Resolution...

Liquidation of Corporate debtor - time limitation - exclusion of time taken by Tribunal to decide to how the voting share of thousands of Allottees will be counted - the...

Quick Updates: