RP rightly rejected belated claim filed by Appellant much beyond ...

Belated claim inadmissible in insolvency proceedings; RP bound by statutory timelines.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

RP rightly rejected belated claim filed by Appellant much beyond extended 90-day period from public announcement as per IBC and CIRP Regulations. RP lacks adjudicatory powers over contingent claims arising from damages and breach of contract. Surprise claims inadmissible to ensure potential resolution applicants aware of liabilities from information memorandum. NCLAT upheld NCLT order dismissing Appellant's plea for claim admission, finding no irregularity by RP in adhering to statutory timelines for timely resolution process.

View Source

← Previous Next →

RP rightly rejected belated claim filed by Appellant much beyond ...

Belated claim inadmissible in insolvency proceedings; RP bound by statutory timelines.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

CIRP - admission of belated claim - financial debt - It is apt to note that one of the most crucial principle is time is essence in any resolution process within which...

The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The...

Scope of duty of RP - Seeking acceptance of the claims which had been rejected by the Resolution Professional - Proof of services provided and debts - The NCLAT held...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of belated additional claims filed by the Appellant-EPFO after the resolution plan's approval. The Tribunal held...

NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and...

Fresh claim after CIRP proceedings - The CIRP is a time-bound process and if the Adjudicating Authority sets the clock back for the reason that the Applicant was not...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

CIRP Proceedings - If a director or a personnel of the Corporate Debtor does not cooperate or creates hindrance or disobeys the instructions of the RP, the law is not...

Disciplinary action against a Resolution Professional (RP) for contravention of provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and lack of due diligence. RP...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The...

CIRP Proceedings against the Personal Guarantors - the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ / ‘Tribunal’, has ‘jurisdiction’, to ‘entertain’/’initiate’, the ‘Insolvency Proceedings’...

The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the objections raised by the Personal Guarantors regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the locus standi of the...

The Noida authority had terminated the lease deed of the subject land prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate...

CIRP Proceedings under IBC versus Tax Dues / Statutory Dues - The High court noted that NCLT should have been cautious before approving the Corporate Insolvency...

Quick Updates: