Refund in cash - unjust enrichment - the prices (both dealer ...

Appellant Granted Cash Refund: No Unjust Enrichment Proven, Burden of Enhanced CVD Rate Not Passed to Buyers (Sections 28C & 28D.

September 18, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund in cash - unjust enrichment - the prices (both dealer price and RSP) indicate that the burden of enhanced rate of CVD has not been shifted to the buyers - the appellant has fulfilled this responsibility as cast by Section 28C and 28D of Customs Act, 1962 and Department has failed to establish any element of unjust enrichment. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund in cash - unjust enrichment - the prices (both dealer ...

Appellant Granted Cash Refund: No Unjust Enrichment Proven, Burden of Enhanced CVD Rate Not Passed to Buyers (Sections 28C & 28D.

September 18, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Refund of excess amount paid over and above 1% of CVD - unjust enrichment - The refund claims were sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority itself. Those were...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Interest on delayed refund at notified rate of interest (6%) to the appellant - enhanced rate of interest - The Commissioner (Appeals) has relied on the decision of...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - except for putting forth arguments theoretically, the appellants have not put forth any incontrovertible evidence to prove that the...

Refund - unjust enrichment - burden to prove and to rebut - All the authorities have concurrently found that the assessee has failed to discharge that burden - no...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Quick Updates: