Refund claim - unjust enrichment - except for putting forth ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 25, 2019

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - except for putting forth arguments theoretically, the appellants have not put forth any incontrovertible evidence to prove that the burden of duty has not been passed on to their customers - Neither from the sample invoices nor from certificate by cost accountant able to prove that test of unjust enrichment has passed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - except for putting forth ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 25, 2019

You may also like:

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

Quick Updates: