Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
SEBI - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2019 Year 2019 This

Unjust/ unlawful gains to the tune of US$ 92 million - ...

Case Laws     SEBI

October 25, 2019

Unjust/ unlawful gains to the tune of US$ 92 million - violations noticed by SEBI relating to the issue of Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) by Cals Refineries Limited (“Cals”), a listed Indian company - the appellants have made unjust/ unlawful gains to the tune of US$ 92 million beyond any doubt - Recovery of amount alongwith interest confirmed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. RBI circulars on various issues relating to money laundering activities and issues relating to FII

  2. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  3. TP Adjustment - US Transactions non US Transactions - scope of MAP agreement - It would be better to refer to the settlement arrived between the competent authority of...

  4. Key Expectations on Budget 2023 - Stay Tuned with us on Feb 1, 2023 since 11.00 AM onwards

  5. Jurisdiction/Validity of show-cause notice issued u/s 11(1), 11(2)(b), 11(4) and 11(B) of SEBI Act - The petitioner alleges that the notice is identical to a previously...

  6. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  7. SEBI issued a circular on "Financial Disincentives for Surveillance Related Lapses" at Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs). MIIs play a crucial role in market...

  8. Validity of notice - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the present case, there is an in advertent error in the notice issued by the AO reflecting only the PAN column...

  9. The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

  10. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  11. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  12. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Date of issuance of notice - communication in electronic form - Whether digitally signing notice would automatically amount to issuance...

  14. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  15. Issue of notice versus service of notice - Income escaping assessment - validity of notice u/s 147 - there has been proper issue of notice within the limitation period...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates