Imposition of penalty on CHA - Department has not been able to ...

Customs House Agent's Penalty Dropped Due to Lack of Evidence of Aiding Importer; Importer Not Penalized.

November 21, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty on CHA - Department has not been able to bring any material on record to show that there is a aiding and abetting by the appellant to the importer - Further, in the impugned order no penalty has been imposed on the importer and penalty has only been imposed on the CHA - Penalty dropped.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty on CHA - Department has not been able to ...

Customs House Agent's Penalty Dropped Due to Lack of Evidence of Aiding Importer; Importer Not Penalized.

November 21, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

Levy of penalty on CHA - The appellate tribunal examined the case where penalties were imposed on appellants for allegedly failing to verify the antecedents of an...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

The case involved a Customs Broker facing penalties under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 for alleged aiding in misclassification of goods. The Appellate...

Enhancement of penalty, levied on Employee of CHA - appellant was reckless and negligent in using the Customs House Agent Licence of his Employer. - Smuggling - red...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Manipulation of import invoices or valuation of goods - Once a violation of CBLR Regulations is admitted, the Revenue has to...

CESTAT ruled in favor of delivery agents, setting aside penalties u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962. The agents, who handled a sealed FCL container from Jebel...

Imposition of penalty on a person treating as Importer - There is no evidence on record that appellant has signed the bills of entry and has given all the documents...

Adjudication of a customs duty dispute involving the import of cars and the determination of the 'transaction value' u/s 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key points are:...

Demand of customs duty based on mis-declaration of weight of imported rough A marble blocks - The Tribunal observed that, it is found that the department established a...

Quick Updates: