Addition u/s 68 - Reason for taking cash loan - The power to ...

Authorities Failed to Apply Section 68 of Income Tax Act Diligently; Case Remanded for Further Review.

December 23, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Addition u/s 68 - Reason for taking cash loan - The power to make additions under Section 68 of the Act of the un-explained cash credit, requires such an exercise to be undertaken by the authorities in a diligent, just and fair manner. But we do not find any such solemn exercise undertaken by the Authorities in the present case. - Matter remanded back.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - Reason for taking cash loan - The power to ...

Authorities Failed to Apply Section 68 of Income Tax Act Diligently; Case Remanded for Further Review.

December 23, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of initiation of review proceedings - It is a trite law that an order, which is bad from its inception itself, cannot be cured by subsequent action. In the...

HC examined proceedings under Section 73 of UP GST Act regarding disputed input tax credit claims. The authority initially rejected certificates filed per Government...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Sunset review for existing anti-dumping duty - imports of rubber chemicals - Designated authority not only has failed in appreciating the material and accompanying...

Insertion of new section 270A - Penalty for underreporting and misreporting of income. - tax payable on under-reported income shall be calculated as if such...

Remand order issued in case concerning refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) for zero-rated supply due to mismatch in ITC as per GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B. Adjudicating...

Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction....

HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

Control of income-tax authorities - U/s 118 of IT ACT 1961 - Specifies the income-tax authority or authorities as subordinate to such other income-tax authority or...

ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY CANNOT REVIEW ITS OWN ORDER. - Article

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of classifying services as either business auxiliary or legal services. The appellant provided Legal Consultancy...

The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the jurisdiction of the Collector (Stamp) to recall or review an order under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act,...

Power to review versus Power to rectify - cancellation of GST registration - the appellate authority erroneously exercised its power under Section 161 of the Act. The...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Quick Updates: