Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Income-tax Rules Amended: Form 3CD Gets Major...     TaxTMI    SCN Issued Two Days Beyond Section 73(2) Deadline...     TaxTMI    CBIC Revises Tariff Values Under Section 14(2) for...     TaxTMI    Diamond Imprest Authorisation Form Updated with...     TaxTMI    Sea Cargo Manifest Regulations: CBIC Extends...     TaxTMI    CBIC Implements Electronic Processing for Personal...     TaxTMI    CBDT Authorizes Waiver of Interest on Delayed...     TaxTMI    GST Assessment Order Set Aside for Lacking Document...     TaxTMI    SEBI Introduces New Governance Rules for High Value...     TaxTMI    Government exempts Bengal gram from AIDC and SWS...     TaxTMI    CGST Rules Amended: Rule 164 Changes Affect Tax...     TaxTMI    SEBI Eases ESG Compliance: New Green Credit...     TaxTMI    CBIC Clarifies Section 128A Waiver Eligibility for...     TaxTMI    Transfer of Development Rights Constitutes...     TaxTMI    GST Fraud Mastermind Denied Bail Under Sections...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2011 Year 2011 This

Adjudicating Authorities Can't Review Their Own Orders Under Indian Law: Maintaining Finality in Decisions.


Adjudicating Authorities Can't Review Their Own Orders Under Indian Law: Maintaining Finality in Decisions.

October 7, 2011

Articles     Indian Laws

ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY CANNOT REVIEW ITS OWN ORDER. - Article

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

  2. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

  3. The Adjudicating Authority had the power to recall its earlier order, which contained factual mistakes, and pass a corrected order regarding the return of the Corporate...

  4. The HC held that the review application was partly allowed. There was no mistake apparent on record regarding the application of the Supreme Court decision and the...

  5. Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

  6. The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report....

  7. Composition of Adjudicating Authority under PMLA and its Jurisdiction - Whether the quasi judicial bodies should consist of members having requisite qualification in the...

  8. Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

  9. Confiscation of goods alongwith vehicle - Section 130 of the CGST Act - As is well settled in law, the absence of reasons by an adjudicating authority in the order...

  10. Validity of initiation of review proceedings - It is a trite law that an order, which is bad from its inception itself, cannot be cured by subsequent action. In the...

  11. All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has chosen to disregard them on the ground that the...

  12. The CESTAT held that the revenue authorities cannot adopt an inconsistent stand in subsequent proceedings when the facts are identical, unless there is a change in law....

  13. The summary focuses on the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the limited scope of judicial review by the adjudicating authority. The...

  14. Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

  15. Jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner to reopen the assessment order and review its own order, in favor of importer - admissibility of the refund claims - The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Soil Purchase for Resale: Can Dispatch Challans Replace Proper Invoice...
F: Company Must Hold EGM to Adopt Financial Statements After AGM Failure,...
F: Jurisdiction Question: Can a Superintendent Issue GST Demand Summary W...
F: GST Audits Have No Time Limitation Under Section 65, Unlike Show Cause...
F: Pre-Deposit Refund After Favorable GST Appeal: System Error Workaround...
F: Taxpayer's Amnesty Scheme Payment at Risk Due to Missing DRC-03A Form ...
A: Mandatory GSTR-1 Filing: Reporting Outward Supplies Under GST With 15 ...
A: Filing OPC Annual Returns: 180-Day Deadline, Required Forms, and Commo...
A: Deodorant Sprays vs. Traditional Attars: Why Natural Indian Perfumes O...
A: Low-Quality Chinese Imports Harm Indian Industries: Solutions Include ...
A: Comprehensive Export Risk Management: Strategies for Political, Econom...
A: India's Pharmaceutical Industry Seeks to Reduce Dependence on Chinese ...
A: Proposed U.S. Tariffs on Indian Pharmaceuticals Could Raise Drug Price...
A: Saharanpur Wooden Craftsmanship: Traditional Artistry Supporting Artis...
A: Preserving Cultural Heritage: How Mithila Paintings Support Women Arti...
A: Mughal-Inspired Mirzapur Rugs: Preserving Traditional Craftsmanship Wh...
H: GST Orders Uploaded Without Proper Service Violate Natural Justice, Co...
H: GST Time Extension During COVID-19: Court Defers Ruling on Section 168...
H: Bail denied for mastermind accused of Rs. 53.03 Crore GST fraud throug...
H: Lufthansa Wins Challenge Against Withholding Tax Rate Change Under Ind...
H: Section 54F Deduction Denied: Timing of House Purchase and Constructio...
H: Tax Relief: Exchange of Old Flat for New in Redevelopment Not Taxable ...
H: Interest on Rupee-Denominated CCDs Must Be Benchmarked Against Domesti...
H: Assessee in Power Business Denied Enhanced 35% Depreciation Under Sect...
H: Taxpayer's Appeal Succeeds as Cash from Selling Deceased Wife's Jewelr...
H: Quantitative Restrictions on LAM Coke Imports Valid Under Section 9A o...
H: Courier Company Penalized for CIER Violations Despite KYC Compliance C...
H: Penalty Under Section 112(b) of Customs Act Reduced for Imported Motor...
H: Customs Act Section 149: Shipping Bill Amendments Require Contemporane...
H: Customs Duty Payment Under DGFT Amnesty Scheme Shields Importers From ...