Refund - The said order dated 8.9.2014 was received by the ...

Case Laws Customs

January 6, 2020

Refund - The said order dated 8.9.2014 was received by the petitioner on 29.9.2014 - Therefore, within one year therefrom, the refund claim was made on 9.9.2015. Though the actual date of application is 8.8.2015 but the receipt stamp indicates the date of 9.9.2015 and accordingly, it was said to have filed within the time limit prescribed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - The said order dated 8.9.2014 was received by the ...

Case Laws Customs

January 6, 2020

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - time limitation - entitlement for Credit beyond six month - since the time limit has been extended from six months to one year by substitution in the...

The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

Expiry of the extended period of limitation - Whether the shows cause notice is barred by limitation of five years also? - In reference to the demand at hand, the entire...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Sodium Bicarbonate (Soda Ash) and Magnesium Sulphate (Epsom Salt) are not enumerated in Entry-9 of the VI Schedule, which covers dyes and chemicals. A Government Order...

Computation of period for filing of appeal in stipulated time - the admitted communication date of the Order-in-Original is 23.06.2014, which has to be excluded in terms...

Set off of brought forward business loss - mistakes in previous years for not claiming benefit of set-off - 8 years time limit provided in the statute - The ITAT found...

Initiation of CIRP - It is clear from the provisions of Section 8 and 9 of the Code, that unlike under Section 7, a Notice under Section 8 is to be issued by an...

Matters to be included in Board’s report - information related to cost records and one more item included - Rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

Initiation of CIRP - Requirement of mandatory service of notice u/s 8 - After the transfer of winding up proceedings as per Rules 2016 read with amendments made in...

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Disallowing the loss u/s 79 - change in shareholding of the assessee company - any loss that is coming from the assessment year 2013-14 is not allowable against the...

Initiation of proceedings as barred by limitation - proviso to section 153C - satisfaction to initiate proceedings u/s 153C was arrived on 15.09.2014 and the six...

Quick Updates: