Validity of Search and seizure action carried out u/s 132 - ...

Seizure of Jewellery u/s 132 Ruled Invalid; Petitioner Denied Return Despite Legal Breach by Officer.

January 30, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Search and seizure action carried out u/s 132 - stock-in-trade (jewellery) was seized - Denial of release of jewellery - No hesitation to observe that the officer in this case has completely ignored the mandate of law. It is also to be mentioned that despite the unlawful action, the Petitioner has been denied release of the jewellery, regardless of his repeatedly representations made to the department.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Search and seizure action carried out u/s 132 - ...

Seizure of Jewellery u/s 132 Ruled Invalid; Petitioner Denied Return Despite Legal Breach by Officer.

January 30, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Assessee's petition dismissed. HC held seizure of jewelry stock u/s 132A valid. Itemized stock register not furnished by assessee to authorities' satisfaction. Net...

Search conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act - Ownership of jewellery in dispute – seizure of Stridhan - jewellery ordered to be released subject to conditions - HC

Seizure of cash in election by ECI - IT Dept. has completely failed to appreciate that neither the seizure was u/s 132 nor the pre-requisite to an exercise of search and...

Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine whether the reasons to believe have a rational connection or are relevant bearing to the formation of such...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

Jurisdiction to conduct search u/s 132 - it is statutorily enjoined for a search to be conducted by the jurisdictional officers of that assessee only. The sole...

Validity of search and seizure u/s 132 - The Bombay High Court quashed the search and seizure actions conducted by the Income Tax Department u/s 132 of the Income Tax...

Addition of excess jewellery found in search - The Court interpreted CBDT Instruction 1916 and emphasized that it pertains to the seizure stage and does not dictate...

The court examined the validity of search and seizure u/s 132, focusing on the scope of Revenue's power and the "reasons to believe" requirement. It held that the...

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

Initiation of search and seizure u/s 132 - stock-in-trade of business cannot be seized during search and seizure operations conducted on or after June 1, 2003 - HC

Search warrant u/s 132 - Retention of cash seized in search - A return of income would be filed by the petitioner for the annual year 2019-20 only after 31st March, 2020....

Entitlement to file a revised return – Search and seizure u/s 132(1) of the Act – An assessee is not entitled to file revised return, once the return under Section 158BC...

Valid search - proceedings initiated under Section 132 - Note of satisfaction does record reasons calling for necessary authorization to carry out search and seizure...

Unexplained jewellery seized during search and seizure operations treated as explained based on assessee's high income and family status. Assessing Officer's addition...

Quick Updates: