Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine ...

Individuals Seeking Fine Refunds Must Prove Their Case; No Presumption of Financial Burden Transfer Exists.

September 13, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine or penalty, there can be no presumption that he has passed on this incidence to any other person - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine ...

Individuals Seeking Fine Refunds Must Prove Their Case; No Presumption of Financial Burden Transfer Exists.

September 13, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Dishonour of Cheque - Rebuttal of presumption - Financial Capacity - misuse of Cheque by the complainant - The High Codurt noted that the Learned Trial Court rightly...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

Dishonor of Cheque - burden of proof on complainant to establish his case - rebuttal of presumption - In the present case non filing or production of books of accounts...

Dishonor of Cheque - standard of proof for rebuttal presumption - The accused has discharged the burden under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act...

Dishonour of Cheque - The High Court observed that, the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is a presumption of law, as distinguished from the presumption of...

Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims - Guidelines issued to ensure uniformity in issuance of speaking order for refund - Details...

Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence...

Refund of the redemption fine and penalty remitted - Department application for revision is pending but no stay / interim protection sought against the order of...

Attachment of Properties - The Custodian sought to recover significant sums from different individuals or entities, claiming they were indebted to the notified party. -...

Refund of Service Tax - unjust enrichment - seeking refund to customers - there is no provision, whatsoever, in section 11B by which one person who has paid the service...

Refund - unjust enrichment - burden to prove and to rebut - All the authorities have concurrently found that the assessee has failed to discharge that burden - no...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Quick Updates: