Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2022 Year 2022 This

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In ...


Section 36A of Central Excise Act: Burden of Proof on Department for Seized Documents Not Linked to Appellant.

July 18, 2022

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence against the person who produced the same or from whose custody or control it was seized that the presumption under Section 36A is available - In the present case admittedly none of the alleged invoices / documents was produced by the Appellant or seized from the Appellant’s premises or control. In view of the above, when the presumption under Section 36A is not available. The burden of proof is squarely on the Department to prove that the source documents are related to the Appellant - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Foreign marked gold was a restricted item, not prohibited. Appellants produced import Bill of Entry from Kotak Mahindra Bank, claiming legitimate purchase reflected in...

  2. Proceeds of crime money laundering case. Respondent Enforcement Directorate permitted to retain/seize/freeze seized documents, digital records, bank accounts from...

  3. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  4. Evasion of Service Tax - Presumption of documents - none of the alleged invoices / documents was produced by the Appellant or seized from the Appellant’s premises or...

  5. Investigation revealed fraudulent Cenvat Credit claims involving fake invoices without actual supply of goods from April 2016 to June 2017. Evidence indicated non-supply...

  6. Clandestine Removal - allegation of two sets of invoices - admissible evidences - it is found that the department has not complied with Section 36B of the Central Excise...

  7. Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of...

  8. Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - Proof of service of order - As per Section 37C of the Act of the Central Excise Act, 1994, the service is complete by speed...

  9. Documents seized during a search and seizure Retained by the Department - As a taxing statute, strict interpretation is to be adopted and that being so, recourse by the...

  10. Smuggling - seizure of foreign origin gold bars - Burden of proof u/s 123 - Reliability of statements recorded u/s 108 - The Tribunal scrutinized the documents provided...

  11. CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - The Appellant correctly availed the cenvat credit. Further, the department nowhere raised any dispute on the said records. Thus...

  12. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  13. Period of limitation for filing export proof under Rule 19 - No time limit is prescribed - Earlier documents were seized by the custom authorities - petitioners allowed...

  14. Assessment passed u/s.153A - Presumption in case of seized documents - Assessee’s son was also covered under the search in the same premises and the document found from...

  15. Smuggling - Gold - It is true that the conduct of the appellants was suspicious - But, the Officers did not have a reasonable belief in the first place to assert that...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates