Benefits of Investment subsidy - the Petitioners are entitled to ...

Petitioners to Receive 25% Infrastructure Subsidy; State May Offset Against Tax Liabilities from Any Transactions.

May 19, 2020

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Benefits of Investment subsidy - the Petitioners are entitled to have the benefit of Investment Subsidy to an extent of 25% of the infrastructure cost , subject to a ceiling of the Sales Tax / VAT / CST paid in the State for the first ' five ' years - Respondents-State are permitted to set off / adjust the investment subsidy payable to the Petitioners, against the tax liability to be cleared by the Petitioners in respect of any past, present or future transactions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefits of Investment subsidy - the Petitioners are entitled to ...

Petitioners to Receive 25% Infrastructure Subsidy; State May Offset Against Tax Liabilities from Any Transactions.

May 19, 2020

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

The High Court held that since the nature of supply was intra-state in respective states, the tax liability shall be discharged individually in each state equivalent to...

Petitioner sought regular bail in case involving alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed using fictitious invoices from non-existent/suspicious firms. As per...

The HC set aside the impugned order due to violation of natural justice principles, specifically non-service of notices and orders that prevented the petitioner from...

External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) for the Infrastructure Sector– Liberalisation - Cir. No. 25 Dated: September 23, 2011

Nature of income - Subsidy received under the Industrial Promotion Policy of the Assam Government - the VAT subsidy received by it for undertaking substantial expansion...

Impugned orders set aside, cases remitted to re-examine issue in light of CBIC Circular No.221/15/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024. Petitioner prima facie not liable to pay tax...

RATES OF INCOME-TAX for the PY 2022-23 i.e. AY 2023-24 [As per previous year Budget and comparison with Budget 2023 proposals] - Notes In the new tax regime increase the...

Interstate sale or Stock transfer - Merely because quantities of camphor may have been transferred in entirety or soon after receipt at the branch also did not create...

Revenue or capital receipt - sales tax subsidy/incentive under the Package Scheme of Incentives Scheme, 1993 - The High Court held that the sales tax subsidy/incentive...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

The petitioners' belated input tax credit denial u/s 16(4) of GST Acts overturned by High Court. Orders set aside, cases remitted to Assessing Officer for fresh decision...

The High Court held that for a works contract involving construction of a barrage across two states, Telangana and Maharashtra, the place of supply would be determined...

Works Contract - applicable rate of GST - AMC services - principal supply or not - Composite supply or not - bundled supply or mixed supply - it is a naturally bundled...

Quick Updates: