The High Court held that since the nature of supply was ...

Intra-state Tax Liability: Onus on JV to Prove Work Ratio.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court held that since the nature of supply was intra-state in respective states, the tax liability shall be discharged individually in each state equivalent to the work executed there. As the petitioner joint venture (JV) failed to produce the inter se agreement or evidence regarding the proportion of work executed by each partner in the respective states, the court could not determine the tax liability. The court observed that the petitioner had not provided evidence of discharging tax liability in Maharashtra. Regarding the refund claim, the court held that as per Section 12(3) of the IGST Act, the place of supply shall be both states, and the nature of supply is intra-state proportionate to the value of services rendered in each state. The demand notices were kept in abeyance till disposal of the refund application in accordance with the court's order in related writ petitions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that since the nature of supply was ...

Intra-state Tax Liability: Onus on JV to Prove Work Ratio.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that for a works contract involving construction of a barrage across two states, Telangana and Maharashtra, the place of supply would be determined...

Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

Works Contract - applicable rate of GST - AMC services - principal supply or not - Composite supply or not - bundled supply or mixed supply - it is a naturally bundled...

Inter state sale or intra state sale - In the present case, the goods claimed to be sold by the assessee to be part of inter-state sales were not sold to the RVUNL as...

Liability to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) for intra-state and interstate delivery of electrical energy. The applicant questioned if they could claim CGST and SGST...

Once the assessee has discharged the initial onus to prove that the deduction is allowable, the onus to prove that the deduction is not admissible, shifts to the tax...

income of the JV as AOP - formed to secure the work, and after that, there was no involvement in the execution of the work which was done by member - members of the JV...

Levy of VAT - Intra-state or inter-state levy? - works contract - turnkey project - If the transfer of goods, which are incorporated in the works, are those brought from...

Remittance from outside India - revenue v/s capital receipt - onus to prove - assessee could not discharge his onus and could not prove that the money has come out of...

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS u/s 194C - There is no sub-contract between JV and the constituents and since the JV has been formed only to procure contract works from...

Inter-State OR Intra-State Purchases - genuineness of the bills from the dealers of Gujarat - purchase of gwar - The Tax Board had committed a manifest error of law in...

SEZ unit - Wrong declaration of turnover - the petitioner was unable to prove intra-state/ inter-state stock transfer to its branch/depot, tax implication would be...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Levy of service tax - works contract - demand based on TDS form 26AS - The liability to pay a service tax is not upon a presumption nor can it be based upon a state of...

Local sale or Inter-State sale - CST - Installation of equipment in another State - The transaction in question is intra- State and not inter-State sale - HC

Quick Updates: