Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2012 Year 2012 This

Merely on the basis of some discrepancies in the goods and the ...


High Court Rules Discrepancies Between Goods and Customs Receipts Alone Don't Prove Smuggling.

September 15, 2012

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Merely on the basis of some discrepancies in the goods and the customs receipts, it cannot be inferred that the goods in question are smuggled goods- HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Smuggling (illicit import) or goods of domestic origin - Betel Nuts - Seizure and confiscation of goods - The goods can be used, sold, re-sold etc. without any duty...

  2. Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

  3. Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

  4. Confiscation of goods - Smuggling - foreign origin Betel Nuts - Impugned goods namely betel nuts are not specified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the...

  5. Confiscation of seized goods - The betel nut being non notified goods; burden to prove the fact of smuggling lies on the department and the same has not been discharged;...

  6. Smuggling - foreign origin betel nuts - Violation of principles of judicial discipline - impugned goods i.e. Betel Nuts and Black Pepper are not the goods specified or...

  7. Smuggling - Gold bars - concealment in the baggage - the applicant crossed the green channel without declaring the impugned articles in his possession in the Customs...

  8. Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

  9. Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

  10. Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

  11. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

  12. Smuggling of IC - Proceeds of Smuggled silver - No Evidence - onus to prove that the Indian currency and the sale proceeds of smuggled goods is on the Revenue - AT

  13. Smuggling of betel nut and black pepper of foreign origin - The Appellate Tribunal observed that while the ARDF report suggested the goods might be of Indonesian origin,...

  14. Smuggling - Absolute Confiscation - The Appellate Tribunal found that the Customs department failed to prove that the mosquito repellents and ladies garments were...

  15. Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates