Addition on account of Sundry Creditor merely for want of PAN of ...

Sundry Creditors' PAN Requirement Disputed for 2014-15; Rule 115B Effective Only from January 2016.

June 24, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition on account of Sundry Creditor merely for want of PAN of those sundry creditors - since the assessment year under consideration is 2014-15 therefore furnishing of PAN number is not mandatory as per Rule 115B of the Income Tax Rules, vide entry No. 18, which came into force with effect from 1stJanuary, 2016.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition on account of Sundry Creditor merely for want of PAN of ...

Sundry Creditors' PAN Requirement Disputed for 2014-15; Rule 115B Effective Only from January 2016.

June 24, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Due to existing disputes with the parties by the sister concerns of the assessee, the assessee could not procure the...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not satisfy the condition precedent before issuing a notice u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act against the...

Income–tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - Amendments in Due diligence requirement - Notification

Maintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - Whether the MOU dated 20 May 2016 is valid or not is a disputed question and needs further investigation. Such...

CBEC notified the Indirect Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2016

The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2016 - Notification

INDIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Power to make rules - Clause 215 of the Bill

INDIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Definitions - Clause 210 of the Bill

DIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Power to remove difficulties - Clause no. 207 of the Bill

DIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Clause 198 defines various terms

INDIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 - Clauses 209 to 215 of the Bill seeks to insert new Chapter XI to provide for the Indirect Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme,...

CIRP - Rejection of Section 9 Application on the ground of pre-existing dispute - The dispute stemmed from services provided by the Operational Creditor to the Corporate...

Rejection of SVLDR scheme - it is clear that any investigation pertaining to the period from 2014 to 2016 by the authorities should not affect the declarations made by...

Applicability of normal period of limitation - whether the normal period of limitation of 18 months is to be applied or 30 months to be applied for demanding service tax...

Refund claim of excess Central Excise duty paid - Effective date of notification - the Notification were not offered for sale by the Directorate of Publicity and were...

Quick Updates: