Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did ...


Tribunal Invalidates Tax Notices Due to Lack of Incriminating Evidence Against Third Party; Deletes Unabated Additions.

December 5, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not satisfy the condition precedent before issuing a notice u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act against the appellant, who was a third party not subjected to search. The satisfaction note prepared by the AO did not meet the legal requirements as the seized material did not pertain to or contain anything incriminating against the appellant. Consequently, the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17 was held to be bad in law, rendering the consequent assessment orders null and void. Regarding additions made in the unabated assessment years, the Tribunal relied on Supreme Court decisions to hold that in unabated assessments u/s 153C, additions are permissible only if based on incriminating material found during the search. Since no such material existed against the appellant, the additions made u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) were directed to be deleted for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  2. Stay of recovery - recovery of tax from its debtors - Tribunal could not have directed recovery of tax from its debtor, who was not a party to the proceedings before the...

  3. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  4. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  5. The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of services as intermediary services for export during 2009-10 to 2013-14. The Tribunal found that the...

  6. ITAT quashed assessment order regarding additions under section 56(1)(vii) amounting to Rs. 139.67 crores made on basis of third-party documents found during search...

  7. ITAT ruled against additions made under section 153A for unsecured loans (s.68) and interest expense disallowance (s.37(1)) in a concluded assessment year. Following SC...

  8. Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad), addition of unexplained cash credits u/s 69A. Registration granted u/s 12AA from 23-02-2019 indicating trust not exclusively...

  9. The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

  10. The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be...

  11. RTI Application seeking information against Private Parties - Allegation of tax evasion - Public interest - The provisions of the RTI Act are not meant to allow the...

  12. CIRP - right of the creditors for recovery of dues of the corporate debtors from the third parties - It is for the Resolution Professional or the successful resolution...

  13. Clandestine production and removal - shortage of goods - duty evasion - The reliance of third party documents while conforming demand against present appellant is...

  14. The assessee university's application for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected due to non-submission of audited accounts and failure to provide necessary...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates