Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - import ...

Penalty Under Customs Act for Importing LED Products Set Aside Due to Manufacturer's Error in BIS Number Misdescription.

July 20, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - import of LED battern fixture, LED panel light, LED flood light etc. - prohibited goods or not - the BIS number embossed on the driver did not tally with the registration number given in the BIS certificate - The misdescription of the BIS number is an error committed by the manufacturer - Penalty set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - import ...

Penalty Under Customs Act for Importing LED Products Set Aside Due to Manufacturer's Error in BIS Number Misdescription.

July 20, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of technical error - non downloading of E-way Bill-01 - The Allahabad High Court reviewed the matter and set aside...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding BIS marking requirements on imported Stainless Steel products. The shipment occurred on January 13, 2017, before the...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

Import of bikes - allegation that the goods do not conform to the BIS requirements - it has to be construed that the appellant has complied with requirement of BIS...

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Cenvat credit availed on inputs and inputs contained in final products lost due to fire - correctness of denial of credit which are attributable to the credit on inputs...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Classification of micronutrient fertilizers - Presence of nitrogen as a chelating agent - essential constituent - In this remand back case from the Supreme Court, the...

Mis-declaration of goods – declaration of import as Diethyl Hexyl Pthalate (DEHP) instead of Di-Octyl Pthalate (DOP) – technical literature shows that DOP and DEHP are...

Quick Updates: