Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 11, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been disturbed and has been accepted, then there cannot be any case for levy of penalty on account of alleged bogus purchases. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 11, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

The ITAT Surat held that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to a defective notice and estimation of income on bogus purchases. The notice u/s 274 was...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1132 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue pertained to penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) concerning the estimation of income on bogus purchases....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - addition sustain on Bogus purchases - When it is not discernible from the assessment order as to whether assessee has furnished inaccurate...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - A.O. has observed that respondent has purchased material from someone else while bogus bills were organized by these Hawala...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition u/s 68 - Head changed from income under “PGBP” (as shown by the assessee) to addition U/s 68 - That there was some tax sought to be...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once, all the documentary evidences were produced before the AO and sales are no doubted, it is doubtful, whether the purchases are bogus...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - bogus purchase made from hawala dealers - mere disallowance of purchases on adhoc basis does not tantamount to willful furnishing...

Quick Updates: