Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Reduction of Share Capital - Allegation on unfair valuation ...


Minority shareholders lose challenge; NCLT can modify resolutions from Extraordinary General Meetings on share capital reduction.

August 21, 2020

Case Laws     Companies Law     AT

Reduction of Share Capital - Allegation on unfair valuation Minority shareholders opposed the scheme - Power to modify the resolution / scheme approved in the EOGM - it can not be said the NCLT has no power. If we assume that the NCLT has no power then it means that the scheme approved by the shareholders, whether wrong or right, the NCLT has to approve. We are not satisfied with the argument of the appellants that the NCLT has no power - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Locus Standi of shareholder of the Corporate Debtor to challenge the Resolution Plan - Seeking for forensic audit of the Books of Accounts of the Corporate Debtor, and...

  2. The appeals challenged the approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd.'s Resolution Plan, alleging material irregularities by the Resolution Professional (RP) and...

  3. Approval of resolution plan with modification - Power of NCLT to modify the plan - Section 31 of the IBC - It is clear that mandate of legislation is either to approve...

  4. Importance of transparency in corporate governance and the rights of minority shareholders

  5. Resolution professional doesn’t require nod of shareholders/members for insolvency resolution

  6. There are certain oppression and mismanagement. The relationship between the Majority Shareholders & Minority Shareholders are strained. Hence, there is a need for...

  7. The NCLAT held that disputes related to shareholder oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act are distinct from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and...

  8. The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that there was no infirmity in the Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting the application to set aside the...

  10. Approval of Resolution Plan - The Tribunal found the resolution plan’s treatment of operational creditors contrary to Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC, as operational...

  11. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority. The key findings were:...

  12. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) does not have jurisdiction to substitute the successful resolution applicant (SRA) with another entity who was not part of the Corporate...

  13. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  14. Fraud - Whether a shareholder, minority or otherwise, can initiate proceedings - for a shareholder to avail a remedy under Section 447 of the Act such shareholder...

  15. The High Court held that the order passed by NCLT approving the Resolution Plan u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is an appealable order u/s 61, with...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates