Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during ...

High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision for Refund; Revenue Fails to Prove Unjust Enrichment by Respondent.

September 21, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during investigation and same was not recovered from the customers - Principles of Unjust Enrichment - Revenue failed to point out any evidence which may indicate that the burden was passed on by the respondent - Refund allowed by tribunal cannot be said to be perverse. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - respondent has deposited lumpsum amount during ...

High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision for Refund; Revenue Fails to Prove Unjust Enrichment by Respondent.

September 21, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The case involved a dispute over unjust enrichment where the appellant was required to prove that customers received machines/equipment as invoiced. The Revenue failed...

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claim - rejection on the grounds of unjust enrichment - The tribunal noted that invoices presented by the appellant showed the duty being passed onto the...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Quick Updates: