By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 1, 2020

By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against Revenue, and by holding that there was no tax liability for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, these two sets of orders passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Authority have resulted in a serious miscarriage of justice, which we cannot permit. The manner in which the various appeals and Miscellaneous Petition have been dealt with by the learned Tribunal for all the three Assessment years in question leaves much to be desired and the change of stand allowed by the Tribunal and later withdrawal of the appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05 under the litigation policy of the CBDT Circular dated 28.01.2016, has resulted in all this goof up. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 1, 2020

You may also like:

Demand of Entry Tax - machinery imported by the assessee during the A.Y. 2000-2001, but exported outside the country in the year 2004-2005 - The event of subsequent...

Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - penalty proceedings for the A.Y. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 were initiated after the period of...

Treatment of sales tax refund as income under section 41(1) - Decided against the revenue.

Service Tax - Coaching and Training classes - demand imposed on advance fees collected during the period April 2003 to June 2003 - decided in favor of assessee on the...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Disallowance of interest on inter-corporate deposits - The observation of Ld. AO that there was increase in borrowed funds during AY 2003-04 has no relevance since the...

Power of Tribunal to enhance the tax liability - The Tribunal is an independent adjudicatory authority having jurisdiction to determine the liability to pay tax. Under...

Waiver of interest and penalty under Sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - respondent himself has accepted that he has understated his...

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Rejection of application for rectification of mistake - Applicability of extended period of limitation - Tribunal did not consider the issue sought to rectified - Maybe,...

CESTAT analyzed levy of service tax on educational programs from 01.5.2011 to 30.06.2017. Tribunal held that pre-2011 tax applicability was institute-specific while...

Cessation of liability u/s 41(1) - liability is being carried forward for years and the assessee is not able to completely prove the genuineness of the trading liability...

Date on which Notification coming into force - N/N. 120/2003 dated 01.08.2003 - whether the Notification is effective from the date of publication i.e. 01.08.2003 as...

The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The provisions...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Quick Updates: