Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - ...

Penalties for late audits u/s 271-B dismissed due to delays, protected by Section 275(1)(c) for multiple years.

February 22, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - penalty proceedings for the A.Y. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 were initiated after the period of more than 4.5, 3.5, 2.5 & 1.5 years respectively after the completion of assessment. Therefore in wake of Section 275(1)(c), no penalty can be imposed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - ...

Penalties for late audits u/s 271-B dismissed due to delays, protected by Section 275(1)(c) for multiple years.

February 22, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) - adoption of multiple year data OR single year data for determining ALP - the fact remains that the legislature thought it necessary to clarify...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Quick Updates: