Deduction u/s 10B - Here in the case in hand, the total income ...

High Court Rules Against Revenue's Method of Income Calculation, Assessee Entitled to Section 10B Deductions Despite Depreciation Offsets.

October 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Deduction u/s 10B - Here in the case in hand, the total income was first arrived at by the Revenue through the AO in the Assessment Order by computing the total income by way of brought forward or carry forward the depreciation allowance of the earlier AYs and set off the unabsorbed depreciation first and making the return Nil, thereby leaving the Assessee in a position where it could not claim any deduction u/s 10B as there was no income after set off of carry forward depreciation and unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years. - This method of computing the income is totally against the said law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction u/s 10B - Here in the case in hand, the total income ...

High Court Rules Against Revenue's Method of Income Calculation, Assessee Entitled to Section 10B Deductions Despite Depreciation Offsets.

October 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Deduction of broken period interest paid on securities and deduction of expenditure incurred on the issue of Fully Convertible Debentures (FCDs). Regarding broken period...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

The ITAT allowed the revenue's appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer to re-examine the issue and refer it to the Transfer...

The High Court held that u/r 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the assessee has the option to choose between the Net Asset Value method or the Discounted Cash Flow...

Addition on account of revenue recognition following percentage of completion method (POCM) - as per AO assessee had incurred substantial expenses on construction but...

Grant received from holding company as capital receipt - AO has not specifically invoked section 56(2). The dubious method adopted by the assessee of claiming the...

Accrual of income - treating of advances received by the assessee from flat buyers as income of the assessee for AY 2006-07 - selection of Project Completion Method or...

Change in method of revenue recognition - Non recognizing income by changing the method - There is no valid explanation for claiming expenses related to the CAS services...

The High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had approved the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method adopted by the assessee for...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

Income from other sources u/s 56(2)(viib) - determining the share value of the premium - Method of valuation of shares - AO did not point out any flaw in the method of...

The High Court examined various issues concerning the calculation of deduction u/s 80IC, eligibility for the deduction, disallowance of royalty payments, and treatment...

The ITAT addressed a case involving a change in accounting policy from Percentage of Completion Method (POCM) to Project Completion Method (PCM) for revenue recognition....

ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal regarding amounts found in a diary and surrendered by a director. The Tribunal held that since the surrendered amount...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that retention money should be included in contract receipts for computing deduction u/s 80-IA for profits from...

Quick Updates: