Valuation - Sale of vehicles - Demand of differential amount of ...

Court Rules Against Retrospective Token Tax Demand on Vehicle Sales; Clarification Effective Post-November 26, 2019.

October 29, 2020

Case Laws GST HC

Valuation - Sale of vehicles - Demand of differential amount of token tax/fees of the vehicles sold - Any clarification issued by the department to a notification cannot have retrospective effect - the department issued the clarification on 26.11.2019. It is not in dispute that after the issuance of the aforesaid clarification the token tax is being calculated on the value of the vehicle including the amount of GST. - The impugned notices directing the petitioner to deposit the differential amount of tax / GST for the period from 03.08.2019 to 26.11.2019, are set aside. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - Sale of vehicles - Demand of differential amount of ...

Court Rules Against Retrospective Token Tax Demand on Vehicle Sales; Clarification Effective Post-November 26, 2019.

October 29, 2020

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The appellant contested the service tax demand on trade discounts and incentives received from Tata Motors Limited for promoting or marketing vehicles. The Tribunal held...

The Court held that the procedure followed by the Directorate of Enforcement in seizing and selling the luxury vehicles was in accordance with the provisions of the...

Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

The clarification addresses a crucial issue concerning the interpretation and application of section 44AE of the Income Tax Act. By providing clarity on the calculation...

The doctrine of prospective overruling is applied when a constitutional court overrules a well-established precedent by declaring a new rule but limits its application...

Service tax liability on sale of imported tally software was disputed. Appellant was a distributor marketing and installing the software on behalf of the seller holding...

This trade circular clarifies the availability of input tax credit (ITC) on demo vehicles used by authorized dealers for motor vehicles. The key points are: ITC is...

E-way bill Rules - Rule 138D as amended - Facility for uploading information regarding detention of vehicle

CBDT's clarification on instructions on Stay of Demand / Guidelines for stay of demand

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The High Court ruled on a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 129 of the GST Act due to an error in mentioning the vehicle number in the E-way bill during the transit...

This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside service tax demands on two grounds. First, the tribunal determined that the supply of DG sets to IOCL constituted a...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

Quick Updates: