Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court ruled on a case involving the levy of penalty u/s ...


Allahabad High Court held that penalty u/s 129 of GST Act not applicable for minor discrepancy in e-way bill vehicle number.

Case Laws     GST

May 22, 2024

The High Court ruled on a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 129 of the GST Act due to an error in mentioning the vehicle number in the E-way bill during the transit of goods. The court found that the discrepancy in the vehicle registration number did not indicate any intention to evade tax, as it was a genuine sale of goods. The court held that this minor error does not warrant penalty proceedings u/s 129. The court set aside the orders of the detaining authority and the first appellate authority, as there was no evidence of tax evasion beyond the incorrect vehicle number in the E-way bill. The petition was allowed, and the orders were deemed unsustainable in the eyes of the law.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

  2. Levy of penalty for discrepancy in E-way Bill - E-way bills generated without completely filling Part B - The object of circular dated 14.09.2018 was that in case of...

  3. Minor error in e-way bill relating to vehicle number, goods detained citing invalid e-way bill. HC held detention unjustified as circular permits imposing penalty of Rs....

  4. Invocation of proceedings u/s 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act - vehicle number was written wrong in E-way Bill and rightly on invoice issued by the appellant - the mistake of...

  5. Levy of penalty - vehicle number in Part-B of the e-way bill was incorrect - minor typographical error - Typically when the error is a minor error of the nature found in...

  6. Time Limitation - issuing a notice after the detention - The High Court noted that the actions of the tax authority did not align with the prescribed timeline outlined...

  7. Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - mistake in entering details of the transporter in the e-way bill - human error - the Department has not placed before the Court...

  8. Expired e-way bill - Levy of penalty - the discrepancy pointed out is only on the date of invoice which is shown as 03.02.2021 while that shown in the e-way bill was...

  9. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - detention of goods - E-way bill yet to expire - Change of vehicle (truck) in between - e-way bill in respect of the goods transported was...

  11. Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to evade tax - expiration of the e-way bill - exported to Bangladesh - On the date and time when the...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - demand based on mere presumptions - the proceedings has been initiated solely on the basis of...

  13. Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

  14. Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

  15. Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates