Revision u/s 263 - Assessee's claim for deduction u/s 10B - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 4, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Assessee's claim for deduction u/s 10B - The decision of the AO to allow such deduction to the Assessee without making any inquiries whatsoever or rather without addressing the issue in his order, rendered his order quite erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Assessee's claim for deduction u/s 10B - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 4, 2020

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Revision u/s 263 - eligibility of claim for deduction u/s 54F - If it born out from record that AO has not examined the claim of assessee for deduction and allowed the...

Revision u/s 263 upheld for a limited purpose that the claim of deduction u/s.10B was allowed by AO without proper investigation. - But simultaneously, CIT has exceeded...

Revision u/s 263 - Incorrect claim of weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) - there can be no two views that when the assessment order was passed by the AO, assessees claim...

Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

Revision u/s 263 - The ITAT held that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries into the sales promotion expenses, as evidenced by the issuance of specific queries to the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 by PCIT questioning the recognition of liabilities 'Nardana Claim-1' and 'Nardana Claim-2' under ICDS....

Revision u/s 263 - AO allowed of the assessee‟s claim for deduction of forfaiting charges as revenue expenditure - as the A.O while framing the assessment had...

Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

Revision u/s 263 - deduction u/s 54 - capital gains/ loss - During the assessment proceedings as well as revision proceeding the assessee had submitted the documentary...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

Quick Updates: