Permission for re-export of imported diamonds on paying the ...

High Court Upholds Decision: Diamonds Re-export Allowed with Penalty for Lack of Kimberly Process Certificate Compliance.

November 21, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

Permission for re-export of imported diamonds on paying the penalty and redemption fine - Import of rough diamonds without KP (Kimberly Process) certificate - The Circular, which permit import of rough diamonds, mandates confiscation on violation of conditions. - There are no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Permission for re-export of imported diamonds on paying the ...

High Court Upholds Decision: Diamonds Re-export Allowed with Penalty for Lack of Kimberly Process Certificate Compliance.

November 21, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The DGFT has introduced a new 'Diamond Imprest Authorisation' (DIA) scheme under Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023. The DIA allows import of natural cut and...

CBIC modified requirements for Lab Grown Diamonds (LGD) export declarations through customs notification. While maintaining mandatory additional qualifiers for most...

DGFT introduced new provisions in Chapter 4 of Handbook of Procedures 2023 establishing the Diamond Imprest Authorization (DIA) scheme. The scheme permits import and...

Processing of Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) applications for SEZs Exports - Public Notice

Clandestine Removal - 997.09 carats of diamonds and 98.34 carats of diamonds - processing loss - whether allegation of substitution of diamonds was established through...

The case involves a dispute over re-exporting 4536 kgs of Organic Cashew Kernel SWP. The appellant sought permission for re-export after the goods did not meet safety...

The directive pertains to the implementation of the Indian Customs Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) System version 1.5, specifically for an Air Freight Station (AFS)...

Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged...

The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter (appellant) allegedly misdeclared the export goods, leading to an excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/-. The...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Penalty under Rule 18 (1) of CBLR 2018 on customs broker - exporter availed undue benefit under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) in the export of safety...

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Quick Updates: