Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter ...


Exporter Penalized for Misdeclared Goods; Tribunal Finds Lack of Fairness and Transparency in Low-Value Duty Case.

December 2, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter (appellant) allegedly misdeclared the export goods, leading to an excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/-. The adjudicating authority confiscated the exported goods for misdeclaration and imposed penalties u/ss 114(iii) and 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key issues and holdings are: 1. The order imposing severe penalties for the excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/- is non-speaking and lacks reasoning on the proportionality of the action. 2. The authority failed to consider a relevant circular issued before the order, which could have mitigated the penalties. 3. The exporter's request for a show cause notice and hearing was not granted, violating principles of natural justice. 4. The waiver of rights by the exporter to avoid demurrage and delays in the adjudication process does not justify the disproportionate penalties. 5. The Commissioner of Appeals upheld the confiscation and penalties based on the availability of goods at the time of the order, without addressing the lack of reasoning and proportionality. 6. The Tribunal held that the order lacked fairness, transparency, and proportionality, and remanding the matter after a decade would not serve justice in this low tax case involving a typographical.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

  2. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, specifically modems and automated teller machine processors. The...

  3. Valuation - Export of Carpets and threading bars - Mis-declaration of description and value - The Tribunal found that while the carpets were misdeclared and subject to...

  4. Confiscation of imported goods - Black pepper - advance authorisation scheme - diversion of Goods - fulfilment of export obligation or not - The Tribunal found that the...

  5. Classification of imported goods - plastic regrind - waste or not - restricted goods or prohibited goods - The Tribunal acknowledges the restrictions on the import of...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 274 regarding unexplained differences in trading sales and purchase costs. The...

  7. The case involves a dispute over the valuation of imported goods, focusing on the rejection of the declared value and the subsequent redetermination based on a Chartered...

  8. Denial of rightful claim of refund of service tax being the Petitioner is an exporter - Under Section 2(20) of Customs Act the term ‘exporter’ would include any owner or...

  9. The case involved a Customs Broker facing penalties under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 for alleged aiding in misclassification of goods. The Appellate...

  10. Re-classification of Thorn - The Tribunal upheld the reclassification of the imported goods to CTI 76020090, agreeing with the authorities that the original...

  11. Claim of foreign exporter to India as owner of goods seeking to re-export - seizure of cargo currently lying in a warehouse at Gandhidham - Mere filing of the ex-bond...

  12. Levy of penalty on CHA - aiding and abetting the importer in the importation of three consignments of misdeclared goods including shoes, alkaline batteries and wooden...

  13. Offence under SEBI - Whether SEBI is required to disclose documents in the present set of proceedings? - The approach of SEBI, in failing to disclose the documents also...

  14. The case pertains to the import of Areca Nuts found to be substandard and unfit for human consumption due to visible fungal growth and musty odor, violating food safety...

  15. The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates