Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2012 Year 2012 This

Mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - if there is no intent to evade ...


High Court Rules Section 11AC Penalties Require Evidence of Intent to Evade Duty Payments; Mere Non-Compliance Insufficient.

September 26, 2012

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - if there is no intent to evade payment of duty, no penalty u/s 11AC - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of...

  2. Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

  3. Appellant filed bill of entry correctly declaring imported goods as Composite Long Rod Insulators on 9-2-2017. Issue involved interpretation of 'composite' and 'polymer'...

  4. Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

  5. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  6. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - mere non-payment of short-payment of duties or taxes cannot be construed as with an intent to evade duties/taxes. There must be something...

  7. Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

  8. Imposition of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Second stage Dealer - Violation in respect of issuing Invoice - proper invoices were not issued and consequently, there is...

  9. Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

  10. The SC held that mere non-disclosure of receipts in service tax returns doesn't mean intent to evade tax payment. To invoke extended limitation period u/s 73(1) proviso...

  11. Classification of imported goods - LC PUFA Mix Oil with Sofinol (edible grade) - whether to be classified under CTH 15079010 or CTH 15179090 - importer misclassified...

  12. Levy of penalties u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - An assessee who has suppressed figures in their account or issued parallel invoices so as to evade the payment...

  13. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  14. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  15. HC affirmed penalties under Section 74 of CGST Act against petitioner for wilful suppression of facts through non-filing of monthly returns and non-payment of GST....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates