Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the proceedings ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 2, 2020

Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the proceedings in limine - Substantial question is answered by holding that in view of language used in Rule 24, the ITAT was not justified in dismissing the appeals for absence of assessee in limine and it ought to have decided the appeals on merits even if the appellant or his representative was not present when the appeals were taken up for hearing. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the proceedings ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 2, 2020

You may also like:

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The High Court held that the order u/s 263 made no reference to the issue of depreciation, and the Tribunal had correctly answered the question by stating that the...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

Appeal against the question which was not answered by the AAR - The question of taxability having been rejected by the lower Authority albeit incorrectly, without any...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

Time Limitation - suppression of fact of manufacture and clearance of excisable goods - It is found that satisfaction recorded initially by the Commissioner and then by...

Claim of depreciation - Payment of non-compete fee - Whether non-compete fees is an intangible asset of any other business or commercial rights of similar nature as per...

Mandatory procedure u/s 260A - scope and procedure to adopted by the HC u/s 260A - The appeal is heard on merits only on the questions framed by the High Court u/s...

Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non prosecution - the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal only on the ground of non prosecution without...

The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral proceedings u/s 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court found no evidence of...

The CIT(A) without pointing out the non-payment of admitted tax to the assessee is not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee in limine - AT

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Quick Updates: