There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this ...

Appellant's Appeal Faces Dismissal for Non-Appearance u/r 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

October 15, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this ...

Appellant's Appeal Faces Dismissal for Non-Appearance u/r 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

October 15, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Scope of adjournment of matter beyond three times - Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - The Tribunal dismisses the appeal due to the appellant's non-prosecution,...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of continuing an appeal post the NCLT's approval of the resolution plan. Referring to Rule 22 of CESTAT...

Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not -...

Non compliance of Rule 16 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules 1982 - it is necessary for Registry to ensure that entire paper book with relevant documents are file within the...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Revocation of CHA Licence - there is no provision for granting stay under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - AT

The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution in accordance with Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The request for adjournment beyond the statutory...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed an appeal due to abatement for adjourning the matter beyond three times, citing Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. Referring to...

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount involved in the appeal - disputed amount is less than Rs.2,00,000/- - the appellant failed to appeared for...

Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no consequence and does not amount to violation of Rule 16 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The contention,...

CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Impleading of the Jurisdictional Commissioner as another respondent alongwith Commissioner (Adjudication) - The Tribunal examined Rule 12 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules,...

Continuance of proceedings under Customs Act - Effect of Initiation of CIRP proceedings and Approval of Resolution plan - abatement of the revenue appeal - the appeal...

Quick Updates: