Profiteering - Restaurant Services - benefit of reduction in the ...

Restaurant Violated Section 171 CGST Act for Not Passing Tax Cut Benefits; Ordered to Deposit Profiteered Amount.

December 14, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - Restaurant Services - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Respondent had increased the base prices of the items supplied by him to neutralise the effect of ITC of 9.11% which was not available to him after the rate reduction w.e.f. 15.11.2017. - Respondent had increased the average output taxable value i.e. the base price by 10.45% to offset the denial of input tax credit of 9.11% - the Respondent liable for profiteering under Section 171 (1) of the above Act and directed him to deposit the profiteered amount vide order dated 16.11.2018. - The time limit prescribed under Rule 133 (1) is not mandatory and it is only directory. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Restaurant Services - benefit of reduction in the ...

Restaurant Violated Section 171 CGST Act for Not Passing Tax Cut Benefits; Ordered to Deposit Profiteered Amount.

December 14, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed on - the Respondent is...

Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on the ITC not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in the price - The Respondent cannot deny the...

The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As...

Profiteering - supply of restaurant service - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in the GST rate not passed - The profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 78,41,754/- as has been computed in...

Taxpayer company availed amnesty scheme benefit, deposited tax amount, but failed to communicate timely due to COVID-19 pandemic and consultant's death. HC quashed...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

Profiteering - restaurant service - the Respondent had increased the base prices of different items by more than 11.16% i.e. by more than what was required to offset the...

Quick Updates: