Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on ...

Allegations of CGST Act Section 171 Violation: Respondent Accused of Not Passing ITC Benefits to Customers, Unlawful Enrichment Claimed.

July 1, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on the ITC not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in the price - The Respondent cannot deny the benefit of tax reduction to his customers and enrich himself at the expense of his buyers as Section 171 provides clear cut methodology and procedure to compute the benefit of tax reduction and the profiteered amount. - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 but has also acted in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the said Act as he has denied the benefit of tax reduction to the ordinary buyers by charging excess GST. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on ...

Allegations of CGST Act Section 171 Violation: Respondent Accused of Not Passing ITC Benefits to Customers, Unlawful Enrichment Claimed.

July 1, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of benefit of Input Tax Credit has not be passed on - The Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project Heritage Max - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC - This benefit was...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - sale of a built up house - DGAP's Report revealed that the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover post GST period increase from 0.61% to 3.45% i.e net...

Seeking grant of anticipatory bail - allegation of availment of fraudulent ITC from fictitious firms and passing on the said fraudulent ITC with an intention to evade...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit...

Profiteering - benefit of ITC and reduction in price of Flat - the Respondent though aware of the fact that the net benefit of ITC had to be passed on to his buyers had...

HC dismissed the petition challenging GST demand for AY 2017-2020. Petitioner allegedly facilitated tax evasion by passing ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC). While...

Profiteering - reduction in the rate of tax or benefit of ITC on the supply of construction service - The company was under CIRP proceedings and taken over by the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Profiteering - sale of Flat - allegation that the benefit of input tax credit not passed on - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - This Authority under Rule 133...

Seeking grant of anticipatory bail - passing on of fake ITC - The offence alleged against the accused is serious economic offence in which ITC was allegedly availed by...

Quick Updates: