Penalty levied u/s 158BFA - inflated agricultural income - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 17, 2020

Penalty levied u/s 158BFA - inflated agricultural income - Tribunal deleted the penalty - The above tax case appeals are dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial questions of law raised are left open. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 158BFA - inflated agricultural income - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 17, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

The ITAT Bangalore, in a case involving unexplained money u/s. 69A, addressed deposits in a bank account during the demonetisation period. The DR argued that the...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the repayment of a loan in cash to a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is not entirely free from doubt, considering the...

Cash deposit in bank account treated as unexplained income - Agricultural income or not? - The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's claims regarding...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty levied by the AO u/s. 271AAB r.w.s. 274 - levy penalty of 30% on undisclosed income - the reasons given by the AO to levy 30% penalty on undisclosed income is...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot arbitrarily reduce agricultural income and add it as income from other sources based on mere...

Income from undisclosed sources - addition of agricultural income - Assessment of agricultural income declared by the assessee for various assessment years was...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Undisclosed income of the assessee - bogus sale of agricultural produce - preponderance of probability theory - The Tribunal noted that the AO had not properly...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Quick Updates: