Rectification u/s 254 - One of the reasoning given by the ...

Tribunal Confirms Cancellation Order u/s 254 Due to Suppression of Key Facts About Share Acquisition.

January 4, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Rectification u/s 254 - One of the reasoning given by the Tribunal to uphold the cancellation order was that, assessee had suppressed vital and material facts regarding acquisition of shares of AJL and the purpose for which it was acquired at the time of seeking the registration. Thus, there is no substance in this contention that, merely because later on this fact was mentioned in the notes to the account of the balance-sheet filed subsequently along with the return of income amounts to furnishing of information at the time of registration. Accordingly, such contention raised in miscellaneous application is rejected. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - One of the reasoning given by the ...

Tribunal Confirms Cancellation Order u/s 254 Due to Suppression of Key Facts About Share Acquisition.

January 4, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Determination of LTCG on sale of shares - period of acquisition - acquisition of shares on the basis of share certificates issued on amalgamation in lieu of the shares...

The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

Refund of service tax paid - entitlement for Cenvat credit of the service tax paid on the ocean freight on the reverse charge mechanism - rejection of refund on the...

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SUBSTANTIAL ACQUISITION OF SHARES AND TAKEOVERS) (SECOND AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2019

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2019

The tribunal granted relief regarding the capital structure, extinguishing liabilities towards financial and operational creditors, legal proceedings, and taxation...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - A capital loss can never arise on the acquisition of shares but only on the transfer or sale of shares. In the second set...

The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case....

Addition u/s 56(2) - “Property” as defined in explanation (d) (ii) of section 56(2)(vii) makes distinction between the existing shares i.e. the shares already allotted...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - any addition which deserved to be made should have been made in the hands of the share applicants who have shown...

Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the penalty levied u/s 270A. The Tribunal held that it was not a case of misrepresentation or...

Extended period of limitation - manpower recruitment or supply agency service - separate employment contract with foreign expatriates - even if it were to be assumed...

Quick Updates: