Levy of penalty for Non disclosures as required under the LODR ...

January 28, 2021

Case Laws SEBI AT

Levy of penalty for Non disclosures as required under the LODR Regulations - What could not done by SEBI when the moratorium under section 14(1) of the IBC was in force cannot certainly be done after a resolution plan is approved and becomes binding on all creditors including government and local authority under section 31 of the IBC. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty for Non disclosures as required under the LODR ...

January 28, 2021

Case Laws SEBI AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

The circular extends the outer timeline for annual disclosures under Regulation 91C(1) and annual impact report under Regulation 91E(1) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

The circular issued by SEBI on Industry Standards for verification of market rumors mandates top listed entities to comply with Regulation 30(11) of LODR Regulations....

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

The circular dated May 27, 2024, outlines timelines for disclosures by Social Enterprises on the Social Stock Exchange (SSE) for FY 2023-24. Not for Profit Organizations...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Quick Updates: