Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 27, 2021

Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The period of 21 months therefore, expires on 31-12-2019 that must stand excluded since Section 92CA(3A) states 'before 60 days prior to the date on which the period of limitation referred to Section 153 expires'. Excluding 31-12-2019, the period of 60 days would expire on 1-11-2019 and the transfer pricing orders thus ought to have been passed on 31-10-2019 or any date prior thereto. Incidentally, the Board, in the Central Action Plan also indicates the date by which the Transfer Pricing orders are to be passed as 31-10-2019. The impugned orders are thus, held to be barred by limitation. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 27, 2021

You may also like:

Transfer Pricing Adjustments - Validity of the order passed u/s. 92CA(3) - period of limitation - 60 days have to be counted prior to the date of last date of limitation...

Period of limitation for palling an order passed by the TPO u/s 92CA (3) read with section 153 - Computation of period of 60 days given by the taxpayer extracted in the...

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word...

Validity of order passed u/s 92CA - Transfer Pricing - Since the ld. TPO order has been passed on 30/10/2015 which is clearly barred by limitation by one day by virtue...

Validity of TP order stating that the orders are passed u/s 92CA (3) - Period of limitation - 60 days period from 31/3/2015 expires on 29 January 2015. But the ld TPO...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Validity of TP order - Period of limitation - Computation period of 60 days given by the taxpayer cannot be faulted with on any ground because from 26.02.2022, the date...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Detention order - challenge on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017 - the...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

Validity of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA without passing draft order of assessment - eligibility of assessee - once TPO passed order u/s 92CA, assessee is an...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - While construing the word 'month', it would mean a month as reckoned according to the British...

Rectification u/s 154 - period of limitation - original order passed by the AO dated 05/04/2011 - AO has already passed a suo-moto rectification order u/s 154 dated...

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - the case was re-assessed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - the case of the assessee was again reopened and the assessment u/s. 143(3)...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

Quick Updates: