Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The ...

Orders u/s 92CA(3) invalid due to missed deadline; issued one day late after 21-month statutory period.

February 27, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The period of 21 months therefore, expires on 31-12-2019 that must stand excluded since Section 92CA(3A) states 'before 60 days prior to the date on which the period of limitation referred to Section 153 expires'. Excluding 31-12-2019, the period of 60 days would expire on 1-11-2019 and the transfer pricing orders thus ought to have been passed on 31-10-2019 or any date prior thereto. Incidentally, the Board, in the Central Action Plan also indicates the date by which the Transfer Pricing orders are to be passed as 31-10-2019. The impugned orders are thus, held to be barred by limitation. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Orders passed u/s 92CA(3) barred by limitation by one day - The ...

Orders u/s 92CA(3) invalid due to missed deadline; issued one day late after 21-month statutory period.

February 27, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision that assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) r.w.s. 144B was time-barred. TPO reference under s.92CA(1) was made on 13.09.2021, with...

HC examined interpretation of limitation periods under Section 107 of CGST Act 2017. The period of "three months" for filing appeal and "one month" for condonation of...

The Transfer Pricing Officer's order was held invalid as it was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 92CA(3A) of the Act read with Section 153. The ITAT ruled...

Validity of TP order stating that the orders are passed u/s 92CA (3) - Period of limitation - 60 days period from 31/3/2015 expires on 29 January 2015. But the ld TPO...

One-day delay in filing GSTR-3B for September 2020 led to reversal of ITC. Petitioner filed GSTR-3B on 23.10.2020, one day late. Respondent issued Form GST DRC-01A on 22....

Transfer Pricing Adjustments - Validity of the order passed u/s. 92CA(3) - period of limitation - 60 days have to be counted prior to the date of last date of limitation...

ITAT determined the assessment order under s.153C r/w s.143(3) for AY 2016-17 was barred by limitation. The order dated 21.04.2021 exceeded the statutory deadline of...

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - There is no requirement under Rule 6(3)(i) and Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules that the option had to be exercised on the first day of...

Validity of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA without passing draft order of assessment - eligibility of assessee - once TPO passed order u/s 92CA, assessee is an...

Validity of Cheque/DD/ Pay Order etc will be 3 months w.e.f. 01.04.2012.

ITAT determined assessment order under sections 263/143(3)/147 was time-barred and invalid. Though AO passed order on 30.12.2015, it was served to assessee on...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Validity of order passed u/s 92CA - Transfer Pricing - Since the ld. TPO order has been passed on 30/10/2015 which is clearly barred by limitation by one day by virtue...

Quick Updates: