Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of ...

Case Laws Customs

March 6, 2021

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate of the Chartered Accountant would show that he has examined records and verified as to the details of the refund claim made by the appellant. Further, it is also shown that the amount was reflected in the accounts /balance sheet under the head ‘Customs Refund Receivables’. This would clearly go to establish that the excess duty has not been passed on to the buyers by the appellant Refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of ...

Case Laws Customs

March 6, 2021

You may also like:

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Denial of refund claim - SAD - Unjust enrichment - The balance sheet shows the amount of 4% SAD as receivable under the asset category. Under the circumstances, it...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

Refund claim of SAD - Principles of Unjust Enrichment - Scope of CA certificate - Refund already sanctioned by the lower authorities - Merely stating that ‘the review...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of excess amount paid over and above 1% of CVD - unjust enrichment - The refund claims were sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority itself. Those were...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Denial of refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - appellant has not provided any service at all. - question of unjust enrichment does not arise - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Simply stating that the goods were sold at a loss does not establish that the duty incidence was not passed - No refund - AT

Quick Updates: