Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2021 Year 2021 This

Import of branded goods in the name of fictitious entities - ...


Court Upholds Ruling on Import Fraud: Fictitious Entities, Misdeclaration, and Undervaluation. Witness Cross-Examination Request Denied.

March 11, 2021

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Import of branded goods in the name of fictitious entities - Misdeclaration and undervaluation - rejection of request for cross examination of the witness - during the course of investigation and while considering the entire matter, the Adjudicating Authority has been able to bring out the facts as to how the appellant has impersonated himself, opened bank account in the name of a fictitious person, remitted customs duty by effecting cash payment in dummy bank accounts, opened in the name of an Enterprise and one person. Therefore, the facts and circumstances of the case would clearly show that the request for cross examination is devoid of merits, lacks bonafide and rightly denied by the Adjudicating Authority. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 (Local Body Tax or Entry Tax Act),...

  2. Valuation of goods - old and used self-propelled platform supply vessel Sagar Fortune - The justification offered for invoking rule 12 of Customs Valuation...

  3. The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking...

  4. HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

  5. The Delhi High Court examined taxability in India of interest received by an Indian Permanent Establishment (PE) from its Head Office/Overseas Branch under the India-US...

  6. Whether penalties and confiscation of goods are justified against the Appellant (customs broker) and its proprietor for facilitating imports by a non-existent entity...

  7. Valuation of imported goods - Related person - Merely because there were transfer of funds in India amongst three importers will not make them related persons in terms...

  8. Seeking grant of Regular Bail - availment of illegal input tax credit - fictitious entities - fake purchases from 24 fictitious entities - seriousness of charge is not...

  9. Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

  10. Confiscation of goods - Goods imported under advance license - Act of fraud established - AT

  11. The case pertains to the classification of imported areca nuts as "roasted" or "raw" for customs duty purposes. The Advanced Ruling Authority determined that if moisture...

  12. The court held that the Original Authority and Revisional Authority misconstrued the scheme and objectives of the Baggage Rules. The petitioner, a foreign national,...

  13. Scope of advance ruling - AAR obtained the ruling by fraud or suppression of facts - misdeclaration of facts - search proceedings were initiated - appellant was also...

  14. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

  15. The High Court addressed the issue of extending stay beyond 365 days by ITAT under the third proviso to Section 254(2A) with the 2008 Finance Act amendment. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates