Fees which can be charged by Investment Advisers from their ...

Court Stresses Minimal Judicial Intervention in SEBI Fee Decisions, Urges Caution on Interim Relief Against Regulations.

May 3, 2021

Case Laws SEBI HC

Fees which can be charged by Investment Advisers from their clients - SEBI is an expert regulatory body established under the SEBI Act and the Court, therefore, would have to exercise judicial restraint and the scope of interference would be extremely narrow. The Court cannot substitute own views in place of views of the expert body. Moreover, it is well settled that the Court should be very slow in staying a law by way of interim relief when the constitutional validity of the law is challenged. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Fees which can be charged by Investment Advisers from their ...

Court Stresses Minimal Judicial Intervention in SEBI Fee Decisions, Urges Caution on Interim Relief Against Regulations.

May 3, 2021

Case Laws SEBI HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Grant of Regular Bail - fraudulent passing of Input Tax Credit without actual supply of goods - While acknowledging the seriousness of the charges, the court noted the...

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner's documents were deficient, and it failed to...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Late Fee under section 234E - On careful perusal of the decision of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in Rajesh Kourani [2017 (7) TMI 458 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] we find...

Scope of challenge to orders passed by the ITSC - Validity of exercising discretion by the ITSC in granting relief to the assessee - Granting immunity from prosecution...

The Central Government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, designated the following courts as Special Courts in Tamil Nadu for cases u/s...

The High Court addressed a business re-organization issue regarding processing a Revised Return u/s 170-A. The petitioner's assessment shifted from Kanpur to Delhi,...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

Deduction u/s 54 - It is settled law that when on an issue there is no jurisdictional High Court decision other Hon’ble High Court decision has to be followed by...

BSE Limited granted recognition as Research Analyst Administration and Supervisory Body (RAASB) and Investment Adviser Administration and Supervisory Body (IAASB) under...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued for wrongful availment of input tax credit by the petitioners. The Court held that...

Dishonor of Cheque - The revisional court is not meant to act as an appellate court. Unless the finding of the court, whose decision is sought to be revised, is shown to...

The court granted custodial bail to the accused, who had no criminal antecedents, in a case involving illegal mining and revenue loss. The accused filed a petition...

Judicial Discipline - Seeking refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - input services or not - The department had not accepted the judgement in the case of Paul Merchants...

Quick Updates: