Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2021 Year 2021 This

Penalty invoking the provisions of section 271D - Managing ...


Managing Director's Cash Infusion Triggers Penalty; Assessing Officer to Verify Fund Sources Under Income Tax Act Sections 271D & 273B.

May 6, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty invoking the provisions of section 271D - Managing Director of the assessee company had extended cash to the company - loan or deposits u/s 269SS - By invoking the provisions of Section 273B, we hereby remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. AO to examine that no unexplained funds are introduced in the business of the assessee Company as loan from the Managing Director and if it found that the source of fund obtained from the Managing Director of the assessee Company is explained then delete the penalty levied invoking the provisions of section 271D - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - cash loan(s) availed form its Managing Director in current account - day-to-day emergency expenses - AO directed to examine that...

  2. Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

  3. The appeal filed by the assessee company was dismissed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on the grounds that the Form 36 (memo of appeal) was not duly verified as per...

  4. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

  5. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 271D - assessee had received the amounts in cash as loan from HUF - there cannot be any better reason for receipt of cash deposits than the death of...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  8. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash deposits - What is relevant is the source for the funds deposited in the bank account and assessee has proved that it has sufficient...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - assessee has made purchases in cash - when the learned assessing officer was not required to enquire on those issues such as purchases in cash more...

  10. The court interpreted Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that managing directors and joint managing directors are responsible for the company's...

  11. Officer in default – whether when the company had a managing director, whole-time director and manager there cannot be any prosecution against the petitioner who was an...

  12. Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

  13. Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

  14. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  15. The ITAT held that once the source of cash is taxed, it cannot be further taxed as unexplained cash expenditure in the hands of the assessee company. The assessee had...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates