Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The court interpreted Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments ...


Sec 141 NI Act: MDs liable for company's conduct, signatories covered. Complaint against directors quashed sans averments u/s 50(1). MD responsible.

Case Laws     Indian Laws

August 3, 2024

The court interpreted Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that managing directors and joint managing directors are responsible for the company's conduct by virtue of their position. Signatories of dishonored checks are also covered u/s 141(2). In the absence of averments u/s 50(1) of the 1984 Act in the complaint, the trial court could not take cognizance against the directors. However, the managing director would be responsible for the company's business. The complaint was quashed against the directors but allowed against the managing director and the company. The Supreme Court's order was modified accordingly.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques)....

  2. Liability of one of an independent Director of a Company under Section 141 of N.I. Act for the dishonour of the cheque issued by the original accused on behalf of the...

  3. The law regarding the liability of a director for an offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act committed by a company is well-established. Section 141, being a...

  4. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient funds - vicarious liability of the petitioner u/s 141 of NI Act after tendering such resignation - the complainant should specifically...

  5. Dishonor of Cheque - person responsible for day to day affairs of the company - In the facts of the present case, the only averment in the complaint is that the...

  6. The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

  7. Dishonor of cheque case. Petitioners described as managers, wives of directors. Court examined whether petitioners can be arrayed as accused. Held, company is principal...

  8. Dishonor of Cheque - CIRP - dissolution of company as per resolution plan - where the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act had already commenced with the...

  9. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Directors, who are not signatories to the cheques - the allegations in the complaint are that at the time at which the...

  10. Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability in criminal law - The SC interpreted Section 7 of the NI Act to identify the "drawer" as the individual issuing the cheque,...

  11. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director u/s 141 of NI Act - The provisions under Section 141 does not make all the Directors liable for the offence. The...

  12. Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was...

  13. Dishonor of cheque case - vicarious liability of directors u/s 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court held specific, unambiguous...

  14. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Directors in the company - There is no specific averment in the complaint to the effect that the petitioners who are all the...

  15. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Independent Directors / company secretary - The complaisant does not particularize the role of the petitioner in regard to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates