Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2021 Year 2021 This

Undisclosed income u/s 68 - In the present case the assessee has ...


Assessee's Claim Validated: No Adverse Findings on Earnings, Amount Can't Be Classified as Undisclosed Income u/s 68.

May 15, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Undisclosed income u/s 68 - In the present case the assessee has explained the nature and source of the amount in question and to substantiate his contention submitted cash flow statement - AO has not given his findings on this point. We, therefore, find merit in the contention of the assessee that in the absence of any adverse findings by the AO on the source of earning of the assessee, the authorities below have wrongly treated the amount in question as undisclosed income u/s 68 of the Act and computed the Tax liability under the provisions of section 115 BBE of the Act. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided...

  2. Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

  3. ITAT ruled against revenue, finding that remuneration paid to the managing director was within permissible limits under Companies Act provisions as per Circular...

  4. Section 68 addition for cash deposits cannot be made where assessee filed return u/s 44AD and did not maintain books of accounts, as provisions of section 68 apply only...

  5. Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  7. Refund of accumulated CGST, SGST and IGST credit - zero rated supplies - The assessee could not provide any such corroborative evidence in the form of document s even...

  8. The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

  9. Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

  10. Refund of amount of mandatory pre-deposit - adjustment/set off the amount of refund against the arrears towards assessee - There exist no other provision in the Act...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  12. Sales Incentive (Commission) paid to different persons - commission paid to HUF - related parties - Assessee had furnished complete details - Payments were made through...

  13. The High Court held that the assessing officer failed to issue a notice before reaching an adverse conclusion regarding the certificate not mentioning the Capital Gains...

  14. SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

  15. Disallowance being amount of State Value Added Tax (VAT) paid for earlier years - Deduction u/s 80IB claimed - Assessee became liable to pay VAT for earlier years - The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates