The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the ...

Assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions claiming LTCG exemption, resulting in addition u/s 68. Court confirms AO's findings.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 21, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market share purchases, delay in dematerialization, and pooling shares with broker. Despite STT payment, the SC ruling highlighted manipulative transactions. The assessee couldn't explain the adverse evidence, leading to confirmation of AO's findings. The onus to prove genuineness wasn't met, making the LTCG claim a facade. The addition was upheld as the assessee failed to establish the credit entry's genuineness. The entire sale consideration wasn't added u/s 68, but the LTCG claim was deemed sham. Decision favored the Revenue due to lack of evidence from the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the ...

Assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions claiming LTCG exemption, resulting in addition u/s 68. Court confirms AO's findings.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 21, 2024

You may also like:

Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - It is well settled principle that the repayment of cash credit would not prove the genuineness of cash credit. It is the...

Addition made u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - unexplained cash credits - suspicious transactions in shares - penny stock - The Tribunal ultimately upheld the AO's decision to...

Unexplained unsecured loan - the necessary papers to establish genuineness of the transaction were filed and the assessee had proved beyond doubt the identity of the...

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock transactions - The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence supporting the genuineness of...

Exemption of purchase Tax – Genuineness of the transactions - Goods bought prior to cancellation of registration – When the said dealer has not proved the genuineness...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Bogus LTCG - exemption under section 10(38) denied - The onus was on the assessee to prove the transaction leading to claim of long-term capital gain was a genuine...

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Bogus LTCG - disallowance of exemption claimed by assessee u/s 10(38) on account of LTCG - there is no live link in the order of SEBI about the transactions of shares of...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - penny stock transaction - The ITAT observed that even though characteristics of penny stock transactions were present, there was no direct...

Undisclosed cash credit u/s 68 - non-appearance of directors - As per DR assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of the share...

Quick Updates: