Appellate order as passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre - ...

NFAC Overlooks Binding Precedent, Applies Non-Jurisdictional Ruling, Denies Assessee Benefits Despite Board's Notification.

June 16, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Appellate order as passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre - NFAC - the centralizedNFAC have chooses to contemptuously ignore the binding precedent of Jurisdictional High Court and have applied the non-jurisdictional High Court decision to deprive the assessee from the benefit of the judicial High Court decision. - A good intentioned and well thought notification issued by the Board for NFAC, is not yielding the desired result on account of incorrect application of law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellate order as passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre - ...

NFAC Overlooks Binding Precedent, Applies Non-Jurisdictional Ruling, Denies Assessee Benefits Despite Board's Notification.

June 16, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

Reassessment u/s 147 - Applicability of Advance Rulings in the own case of assessee or Advance Rulings in case of any other assessee - In view of the clear mandate of...

Addition of delayed payment of employees’ contribution of EPF and ESI - paid before the due date of filing of return - the CIT(A) was duty bound to follow the binding...

Commissioner failed to follow binding Tribunal precedents on classification of bio-fungicides and bio-insecticides, erroneously believing Supreme Court appeals left...

CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Refund on the exports made by the petitioner - Prescribed procedure for filing of correct GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns - details itself have not been received from GSTN...

Dispute centered on Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules regarding input tax credit (ITC) calculations following tax rate reduction on iron and steel goods. SC upheld HC's...

CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule...

TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the comparables selected by the assessee - As assessee, has applied the internal TNMM method as most appropriate and from the aforesaid rule...

Quick Updates: