Refund of pre-deposit - Unjust Enrichment - Amount credited to ...

Pre-Deposits Are Refundable: Challenging Unjust Enrichment and Ensuring Compliance with Circulars for Consumer Welfare Fund Credits.

June 22, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund of pre-deposit - Unjust Enrichment - Amount credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund - The attempt to persuade us that this absurdity has been legislatively intended does not evoke resonance from us. It would not be wrong to posit that ‘predeposit’ is contingent not upon orders of the Tribunal but on carrying disputes to the Tribunal. - the competent authorities are directed to ensure compliance with circular - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of pre-deposit - Unjust Enrichment - Amount credited to ...

Pre-Deposits Are Refundable: Challenging Unjust Enrichment and Ensuring Compliance with Circulars for Consumer Welfare Fund Credits.

June 22, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Rejection of refund - Pre-deposit or receivable - principles of unjust enrichment - On the one hand, the appellant claims that the amount paid is to be treated as...

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

Exemption from Pre-deposit - The petitioner argued that their request for exemption from pre-deposit was wrongly rejected, and they challenged the jurisdiction of...

Refund of Pre-deposit alongwith interest - Adjustment of pre-deposit with pending demand - A pre-deposit would become refundable the moment an Appellate Authority comes...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Refund claim of pre-deposit - Once the Commissioner (Appeals) has established that the amount in question was a pre-deposit, the legal principle laid down by this Court,...

Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

The appellant is entitled to refund of the amount deposited 'under protest' during the pendency of adjudication proceedings and investigation, as it cannot be considered...

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund of India - o the amount deposited during investigation, basing - The...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding refund of Rs.16,14,167/- deposited as pre-deposit under Section 35F. The amount was determined to be a mandatory pre-deposit...

Quick Updates: